| BatchKi Reference Manual | |||||||||||||||
Subsections
|
|
The first row in the spreadsheet contains the field labels listed in Tables 6.1 and 6.2. Detailed explanation of all quantities contained in the tab-delimited output file is given below.
Unique plate I.D. as entered in the input file in the <Plate id"..." ...> parameter.
Unique textual identifier for the enzyme (e.g., HIV-PROT, THROMBIN, etc.).
Enzyme concentration in moles per liter, characteristic for the given dose-response curve.
Unique identifier for the substrate, characteristic for the given dose-response curve (e.g., BACHEM-B1234-LOT#5678).
Substrate concentration in moles per liter, characteristic for the given dose-response curve.
Unique identifier for the inhibitor, for example, a corporate I.D.
Apparent inhibition constant
obtained by the least-squares fit of the dose-response data to equation 4.3 explained in section 4.5.11. In the case of a competitive enzyme inhibitor, the apparent inhibition constant
relates to the true inhibition constant
via equation 6.1, where
is the substrate concentration and
is the Michaelis constant. For other types of enzyme inhibition (e.g., uncompetitive or mixed-type) see ref. [9].
The formal standard error of the apparent inhibition constant is computed by using equation 6.2,
where
is the
th diagonal element of the inverse Hessian matrix ([12], p. 22; [13], p. 685, eq. 15.5.15);
is the sum of squared deviations between the fitting model (equation 4.3) and the experimental data;
is the number of data points in the dose-response curve; and
is the number of optimized parameters (typically two parameters, namely, the apparent inhibition constant
and the control velocity
). The difference
represents the number of degrees of freedom (see below).
The coefficient of variation (CV) for the apparent inhibition constant is defined in terms of the formal standard error as is shown in equation 6.3.
The formal standard error of the apparent inhibition constant defined by equation 6.2 can be used to compute in a very simple fashion a linear approximation of the confidence interval at the given probability level (see parameter prlev below). In particular, the
confidence interval is defined in terms of the standard error
as is shown in equation 6.4,
where
is the Student
-statistic at
probability level with
degrees of freedom ([3], p. 6, eq. 1.12). For example, for nine data points
, two optimized parameters
, and the desired 95% probability level, the relevant Student
-statistic is
.
When discussing linear confidence intervals, many elementary textbooks on data analysis confusingly (and incorrectly) refer to a ``two-tailed''-statistics, where the probability level is
for the 95% confidence interval.
Thus the approximate lower limit for the apparent inhibition constant is defined by equation 6.5.
The upper limit of the approximate confidence interval at the given probability level is defined by equation 6.6 explained in the preceding paragraph.
A significantly better estimate of the confidence interval for the apparent inhibition constant can be obtained by using an exhaustive search of the least-squares surface in the parameter space. BatchKi uses a modification of the profile-t search method described by Bates and Watts ([3], pp. 302-303). Parameter cnflo is the lower limit of the confidence interval for
at the given probability level, obtained by the profile-t method [3].
Upper limit of the confidence interval for
at the given probability level, obtained by the profile-t method [3].
Under normal circumstances, i.e., when the confidence interval for the apparent inhibition constant can be easily determined from the data, the probability level reached at the end of the profile-t search algorithm ([3], p. 302) will be identical to the desired probability level (e.g., 95%). In this case, the prblo parameter will be numerically equal to prlev (see below).
When the lower limit of the confidence interval for
cannot be determined from the available data, the prblo parameter will not be numerically equal to prlev (e.g., 95.0%), but instead it will be somewhat lower. If this condition is diagnosed in the output file, the lower limit of the confidence interval (cnflo) should be ignored as not reliable.
See the explanation of prblo in the preceding paragraph.
This is the desired probability level (as percentage points) for the computation of confidence intervals in BatchKi. A typical value is 95%. The actual value of the desired confidence interval is defined in the BatchKi initialization file (see section 4.1.3).
Defined as the difference
, where
is the number of data points in the dose-response curve and
is the number of optimized parameters (typically two parameters).
The standard deviation of fit is defined by equation 6.7,
where
is the sum of squared deviations between the fitting model and the experimental reaction velocities,
is the number of data points on each dose-response curve and
is the number of optimized parameters.
This parameter is defined as a percentage of standard deviation of fit relative to the best-fit value of the control velocity
, as defined by equation 6.8. It measures the overall goodness of fit of initial velocities.
Values of relative standard deviation of fit below five
indicate good agreement between the fitting model and the experimental data. In contrast, value higher than ten
indicate that the experimental data either contain a severely outlying data point, or there is a systematic deviation from the assumed mathematical model. In either case, values of apparent inhibition constant associated with
should be regarded as suspect.
Either the best-fit value of enzyme concentration (if this value were treated as an optimized parameter), or the nominal value, if
were treated as a constant. The units are moles per liter.
If the enzyme concentration
were treated as an optimized parameter, this value contains the formal standard error. The parameter is set to zero if
were treated as a constant.
The best-fit value of the reaction velocity observed in the absence of inhibitors. This value generally will be different for different dose-response curves, even though the experimental data (control wells) are the same. This is because the value is obtained by fitting each dose-response curve separately to equation 4.3.
Formal standard error associated with the best-fit value of the reaction velocity observed in the absence of inhibitors (see preceding paragraph).
Either the best-fit value of the baseline velocity
in equation 4.3, (if this value were in fact treated as an optimized parameter), or zero value if
were treated as a constant.
If the baseline velocity
were treated as an optimized parameter, this value contains the formal standard error. The parameter is set to zero if
were considered as a constant.
The adjusted regression coefficient
(also known as adjusted coefficient of determination) is computed from equation 6.10, where
is the number of data points,
is the number of optimized model parameters, and
is the coefficient of determination defined by equation 6.9. In equation 6.9,
is the experimental value of reaction velocity for the
th data point,
is the best-fit value of reaction velocity computed according to the appropriate regression model (equation 4.3 or 4.4), and
is the average of all
values.
| Next: Plate Summary Files Up: Output Files Previous: Output Files Contents Index |